↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of Two Main Orthokeratology Lens Designs in Efficacy and Safety for Myopia Control

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of Two Main Orthokeratology Lens Designs in Efficacy and Safety for Myopia Control
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, April 2022
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2022.798314
Pubmed ID
Authors

Weiwei Lu, Rui Ning, Kai Diao, Yang Ding, Ruru Chen, Lei Zhou, Yan Lian, Colm McAlinden, Francis W. B. Sanders, Fangfang Xia, Jinhai Huang, Wanqing Jin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 11%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 10 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 11%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Unknown 11 61%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2022.
All research outputs
#15,512,170
of 23,053,169 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#3,074
of 5,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,989
of 440,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#317
of 600 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,169 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,817 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 600 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.