The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A systematic review protocol for assessing equity in clinical practice guidelines for traumatic brain injury and homelessness
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2022.815660 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vincy Chan, Maria Jennifer Estrella, Jessica Babineau, Angela Colantonio |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 5 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Scientists | 3 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2022.
All research outputs
#5,516,043
of 26,579,895 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#1,623
of 7,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,188
of 440,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#96
of 557 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,579,895 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,684 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 557 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.