↓ Skip to main content

Cost-accuracy and patient experience assessment of blood pressure monitoring methods to diagnose hypertension: A comparative effectiveness study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, November 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cost-accuracy and patient experience assessment of blood pressure monitoring methods to diagnose hypertension: A comparative effectiveness study
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, November 2022
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2022.827821
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luis González-de Paz, Belchin Kostov, Xavier Freixa, Carmen Herranz, Elena Lagarda, María Ortega, Elisa Pérez, Silvia Porcar, Eva Sánchez, Montserrat Serrato, Ingrid Vidiella, Antoni Sisó-Almirall

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 1 17%
Lecturer 1 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 33%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2022.
All research outputs
#6,993,288
of 23,213,531 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#1,624
of 5,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,395
of 442,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#102
of 503 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,213,531 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,928 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 503 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.