The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Clinical Relevance of the LVEDD and LVESD Trajectories in HF Patients With LVEF < 35%
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, May 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2022.846361 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yu-Chen Chen, Shi-Chue Hsing, Yuan-Ping Chao, Yung-Wen Cheng, Chin-Sheng Lin, Chin Lin, Wen-Hui Fang |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 22% |
Unspecified | 1 | 11% |
Other | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 22% |
Unspecified | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2022.
All research outputs
#6,589,683
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#1,544
of 5,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,760
of 442,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#127
of 587 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,971 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 587 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.