You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Multi-Site Observational Study to Assess Biomarkers for Susceptibility or Resilience to Chronic Pain: The Acute to Chronic Pain Signatures (A2CPS) Study Protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2022.849214 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giovanni Berardi, Laura Frey-Law, Kathleen A. Sluka, Emine O. Bayman, Christopher S. Coffey, Dixie Ecklund, Carol G. T. Vance, Dana L. Dailey, John Burns, Asokumar Buvanendran, Robert J. McCarthy, Joshua Jacobs, Xiaohong Joe Zhou, Richard Wixson, Tessa Balach, Chad M. Brummett, Daniel Clauw, Douglas Colquhoun, Steven E. Harte, Richard E. Harris, David A. Williams, Andrew C. Chang, Jennifer Waljee, Kathleen M. Fisch, Kristen Jepsen, Louise C. Laurent, Michael Olivier, Carl D. Langefeld, Timothy D. Howard, Oliver Fiehn, Jon M. Jacobs, Panshak Dakup, Wei-Jun Qian, Adam C. Swensen, Anna Lokshin, Martin Lindquist, Brian S. Caffo, Ciprian Crainiceanu, Scott Zeger, Ari Kahn, Tor Wager, Margaret Taub, James Ford, Stephani P. Sutherland, Laura D. Wandner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 40% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Researcher | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 19 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 21% |
| Psychology | 5 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 19 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2022.
All research outputs
#4,076,206
of 23,371,053 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#1,010
of 5,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,948
of 443,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#75
of 564 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,371,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 564 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.