You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Lung Ventilation/Perfusion Scintigraphy for the Screening of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension (CTEPH): Which Criteria to Use?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2022.851935 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Romain Le Pennec, Cécile Tromeur, Charles Orione, Philippe Robin, Raphaël Le Mao, Claire De Moreuil, Mitja Jevnikar, Clément Hoffman, Laurent Savale, Francis Couturaud, Olivier Sitbon, David Montani, Xavier Jaïs, Grégoire Le Gal, Pierre Yves Salaün, Marc Humbert, Pierre Yves Le Roux |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 23% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 31% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2022.
All research outputs
#4,159,241
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#967
of 5,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,948
of 435,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#78
of 608 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,557 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 608 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.