↓ Skip to main content

Study Protocol: A Randomized Controlled Prospective Single-Center Feasibility Study of Rheopheresis for Raynaud’s Syndrome and Digital Ulcers in Systemic Sclerosis (RHEACT Study)

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Study Protocol: A Randomized Controlled Prospective Single-Center Feasibility Study of Rheopheresis for Raynaud’s Syndrome and Digital Ulcers in Systemic Sclerosis (RHEACT Study)
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, April 2022
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2022.871744
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan-Gerd Rademacher, Björn Tampe, Angela Borisch, Rosa Marie Buschfort, Andrea von Figura, Thomas Asendorf, Peter Korsten

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Unspecified 1 11%
Student > Postgraduate 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 22%
Unspecified 1 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2022.
All research outputs
#15,687,628
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#3,184
of 5,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,025
of 442,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#294
of 581 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,971 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 581 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.