The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Efficacy and Safety of Electro-Thumbtack Needle Therapy for Patients With Chronic Neck Pain: Protocol for a Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2022.872362 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hangyu Shi, Xinlu Wang, Yan Yan, Lili Zhu, Yu Chen, Shuai Gao, Zhishun Liu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 17% |
| Researcher | 2 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 11% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2022.
All research outputs
#15,491,333
of 23,792,386 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#3,022
of 6,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,834
of 445,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#253
of 566 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,792,386 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 566 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.