The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Predictive and Prognostic Roles of Gut Microbial Variation in Liver Transplant
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2022.873523 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jen Wong, Wen Hui Lim, Cheng Han Ng, Darren Jun Hao Tan, Glenn K. Bonney, Alfred W. C. Kow, Daniel Q. Huang, Mohammad Shadab Siddiqui, Mazen Noureddin, Nicholas Syn, Mark D. Muthiah |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Singapore | 2 | 20% |
| Unknown | 8 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 12% |
| Researcher | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 12% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2023.
All research outputs
#6,656,517
of 26,146,017 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#1,704
of 7,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,464
of 450,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#135
of 598 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,146,017 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,419 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 598 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.