The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
“Debriefing and Organizational Lessons Learned” (DOLL): A Qualitative Study to Develop a Classification Framework for Reporting Clinical Debriefing Results
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2022.882326 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Méryl Paquay, Nadège Dubois, Anh Nguyet Diep, Gwennaëlle Graas, Tamara Sassel, Justine Piazza, Jean-Christophe Servotte, Alexandre Ghuysen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 33% |
| Ireland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 12% |
| Researcher | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
| Librarian | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 20 | 59% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 20 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2022.
All research outputs
#15,450,085
of 24,946,857 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#2,883
of 6,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,496
of 434,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#219
of 576 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,946,857 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,913 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 576 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.