↓ Skip to main content

A Comparison of Post-marketing Measures Imposed by Regulatory Agencies to Confirm the Tissue-Agnostic Approach

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Comparison of Post-marketing Measures Imposed by Regulatory Agencies to Confirm the Tissue-Agnostic Approach
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, June 2022
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2022.893400
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jorn Mulder, Odile C. van Stuijvenberg, Paula B. van Hennik, Emile E. Voest, Anna M. G. Pasmooij, Violeta Stoyanova-Beninska, Anthonius de Boer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 13%
Lecturer 1 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2023.
All research outputs
#5,496,991
of 26,146,017 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#1,588
of 7,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,529
of 448,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#119
of 587 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,146,017 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,419 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 587 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.