The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reliability, repeatability, and accordance between three different corneal diagnostic imaging devices for evaluating the ocular surface
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2022.893688 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Abril L. Garcia-Terraza, David Jimenez-Collado, Francisco Sanchez-Sanoja, José Y. Arteaga-Rivera, Norma Morales Flores, Sofía Pérez-Solórzano, Yonathan Garfias, Enrique O. Graue-Hernández, Alejandro Navas |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 18% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 18% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 9% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2022.
All research outputs
#13,869,208
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#2,280
of 5,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,601
of 431,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#186
of 558 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,749 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 558 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.