↓ Skip to main content

Episiotomy Practice and Its Associated Factors in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Episiotomy Practice and Its Associated Factors in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, June 2022
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2022.905174
Pubmed ID
Authors

Beshada Zerfu Woldegeorgis, Mohammed Suleiman Obsa, Lemi Belay Tolu, Efa Ambaw Bogino, Tesfalem Israel Boda, Henok Berhanu Alemu

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 20 59%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 20 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2022.
All research outputs
#20,420,242
of 22,971,207 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#4,967
of 5,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#353,158
of 440,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#452
of 582 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,971,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 582 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.