The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Case study of cervical cancer prevention in two sub-Saharan African countries: Rwanda and Sierra Leone
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2022.928685 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mohamed S. Bangura, Yuqian Zhao, Maria Jose Gonzalez Mendez, Yixuan Wang, Salah Didier Sama, Kunpeng Xu, Ran Ren, Li Ma, You-Lin Qiao |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Researcher | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 23 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 20% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 22 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2022.
All research outputs
#15,808,427
of 23,476,369 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#3,221
of 6,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,276
of 434,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#247
of 496 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,476,369 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,031 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 496 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.