The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mapping progress in intravascular catheter quality surveillance: An Australian case study of electronic medical record data linkage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2022.962130 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jessica A. Schults, Daner L. Ball, Clair Sullivan, Nick Rossow, Gillian Ray-Barruel, Rachel M. Walker, Bela Stantic, Claire M. Rickard |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 20% |
| Australia | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 20 | 69% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 3 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 21 | 72% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2022.
All research outputs
#7,999,325
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#2,094
of 7,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,995
of 433,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#122
of 541 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 541 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.