You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Randomized double-blind clinical study in patients with COVID-19 to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a phytomedicine (P2Et)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, September 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2022.991873 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Claudia Urueña, Ricardo Ballesteros-Ramírez, Alejandra Gomez-Cadena, Alfonso Barreto, Karol Prieto, Sandra Quijano, Pablo Aschner, Carlos Martínez, Maria I. Zapata-Cardona, Hajar El-Ahanidi, Camilla Jandus, Lizdany Florez-Alvarez, Maria Teresa Rugeles, Wildeman Zapata-Builes, Angel Alberto Garcia, Susana Fiorentino |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Colombia | 3 | 25% |
Comoros | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 8 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
Scientists | 2 | 17% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 14% |
Researcher | 3 | 14% |
Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 9 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 24% |
Engineering | 2 | 10% |
Chemistry | 2 | 10% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 9 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2023.
All research outputs
#4,649,972
of 25,303,733 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#1,295
of 7,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,298
of 426,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#67
of 506 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,303,733 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 506 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.