↓ Skip to main content

Quantitative pupillary light reflex assessment for prognosis of carbon monoxide poisoning

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quantitative pupillary light reflex assessment for prognosis of carbon monoxide poisoning
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, February 2023
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2023.1105705
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yong Sung, Sang-Bae Ko, Tae-Hwa Go, Dong Keon Lee

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2023.
All research outputs
#18,931,665
of 23,462,326 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#4,201
of 6,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225,128
of 333,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#154
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,462,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,026 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.