The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Premorbid use of selective beta-blockers improves sepsis incidence and course: Human cohort and animal model studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, April 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2023.1105894 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shiao-Ya Hong, Chih-Cheng Lai, Nai-Chi Teng, Chao-Hsien Chen, Chun-Chun Hsu, Nai-Ju Chan, Cheng-Yi Wang, Ya-Hui Wang, You Shuei Lin, Likwang Chen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2023.
All research outputs
#16,375,629
of 25,850,376 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#3,243
of 7,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,468
of 417,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#122
of 355 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,376 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,346 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 355 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.