The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Clinical efficacy of tetrandrine in artificial stone-associated silicosis: A retrospective cohort study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, February 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2023.1107967 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Wen-hong Wu, Yong-hong Feng, Chun-yan Min, Shao-wei Zhou, Zi-dan Chen, Li-min Huang, Wen-lan Yang, Guang-hong Yang, Jun Li, Jin Shi, Hua Quan, Ling Mao |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 17% |
Other | 1 | 17% |
Student > Master | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 2 | 33% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 17% |
Unspecified | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 242. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2023.
All research outputs
#144,307
of 24,348,815 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#60
of 6,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,758
of 411,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#4
of 391 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,348,815 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,599 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 391 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.