The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Case report: Successful outcome of a young patient with rhabdomyolysis and shock caused by diquat poisoning
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, February 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2023.1116912 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yunchao Chen, Zejin Ou, Ruichang Zhang, Zhenhong Long, Rushen Fu, Shihao Tang, Zhi Wang |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2023.
All research outputs
#21,715,850
of 24,240,330 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#5,740
of 6,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#369,446
of 440,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#327
of 376 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,240,330 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,523 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 376 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.