↓ Skip to main content

How about the evidence assessment tools used in education and management systematic reviews?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How about the evidence assessment tools used in education and management systematic reviews?
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, May 2023
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2023.1160289
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hui Lan, Xuan Yu, Zhe Wang, Ping Wang, Yajia Sun, Zijun Wang, Renfeng Su, Ling Wang, Junxian Zhao, Yue Hu, Shouyuan Wu, Mengjuan Ren, Kehu Yang, Xingrong Liu, Yaolong Chen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Lecturer 1 20%
Other 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 1 20%
Computer Science 1 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2023.
All research outputs
#19,150,947
of 23,730,866 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#4,300
of 6,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,343
of 207,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#69
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,730,866 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,175 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.