The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Case report: Medical treatment for limbal epithelial stem cell deficiency in patients treated for glaucoma
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, July 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2023.1161568 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shunsuke Nakakura, Sachiko Maruoka, Taiichiro Chikama, Yuki Nagata, Etsuko Terao, Kanae Ueda, Saki Dote, Satomi Oogi |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2023.
All research outputs
#19,551,491
of 24,049,457 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#4,490
of 6,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,169
of 188,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#78
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,049,457 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,402 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.