The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Six-item cognitive impairment test (6-CIT)’s accuracy as a cognitive screening tool: best cut-off levels in emergency department setting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, July 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2023.1186502 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Francesco Salis, Daniela Pili, Manuel Collu, Luca Serchisu, Rosanna Laconi, Antonella Mandas |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 75% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 75% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2023.
All research outputs
#4,553,160
of 24,253,070 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#1,192
of 6,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,822
of 236,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#25
of 196 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,253,070 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 196 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.