The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Gender and sex bias in prevention and clinical treatment of women’s chronic pain: hypotheses of a curriculum development
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, July 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2023.1189126 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Chiara Moretti, Enrico De Luca, Clelia D’Apice, Giovanna Artioli, Leopoldo Sarli, Antonio Bonacaro |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 4 | 14% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
Researcher | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 17 | 61% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 4 | 14% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 14% |
Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 17 | 61% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2024.
All research outputs
#1,152,871
of 26,534,649 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#338
of 7,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,269
of 371,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#9
of 309 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,534,649 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,641 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 309 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.