The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Is the internet a sufficient source of information on sarcoidosis?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2023.1217146 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katharina Buschulte, Philipp Höger, Claudia Ganter, Marlies Wijsenbeek, Nicolas Kahn, Katharina Kriegsmann, Finn M. Wilkens, Jolene H. Fisher, Christopher J. Ryerson, Felix J. F. Herth, Michael Kreuter |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2023.
All research outputs
#21,583,280
of 24,083,187 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#5,646
of 6,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,600
of 243,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#162
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,083,187 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.