↓ Skip to main content

Clinical and pulmonary function analysis in long-COVID revealed that long-term pulmonary dysfunction is associated with vascular inflammation pathways and metabolic syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, October 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
25 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical and pulmonary function analysis in long-COVID revealed that long-term pulmonary dysfunction is associated with vascular inflammation pathways and metabolic syndrome
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, October 2023
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2023.1271863
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sergio Sanhueza, Mabel A. Vidal, Mauricio A. Hernandez, Mario E. Henriquez-Beltran, Camilo Cabrera, Romina Quiroga, Bárbara E. Antilef, Kevin P. Aguilar, Daniela A. Castillo, Faryd J. Llerena, Marco Fraga Figueroa, Mauricio Nazal, Eritson Castro, Paola Lagos, Alexa Moreno, Jaime J. Lastra, Jorge Gajardo, Pamela Garcés, Benilde Riffo, Jorge Buchert, Rocío Sanhueza, Valeska Ormazába, Pablo Saldivia, Cristian Vargas, Guillermo Nourdin, Elard Koch, Felipe A. Zuñiga, Liliana Lamperti, Paula Bustos, Enrique Guzmán-Gutiérrez, Claudio A. Tapia, Luciano Ferrada, Gustavo Cerda, Ute Woehlbier, Erick Riquelme, Maria-Isabel Yuseff, Braulio A. Muñoz Ramirez, Giovanna Lombardi, David De Gonzalo-Calvo, Carlos Salomon, Ricardo A. Verdugo, Luis A. Quiñones, Alicia Colombo, Maria I. Barría, Gonzalo Labarca, Estefania Nova-Lamperti

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Unspecified 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Master 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 19 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 17%
Unspecified 4 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Environmental Science 2 6%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 18 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2024.
All research outputs
#885,760
of 26,337,162 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#267
of 7,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,081
of 369,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#4
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,337,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,488 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.