The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Addressing bias in the definition of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection: implications for underestimation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, March 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2024.1363045 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hiam Chemaitelly, Houssein H. Ayoub, Patrick Tang, Hadi M. Yassine, Asmaa A. Al Thani, Mohammad R. Hasan, Peter Coyle, Zaina Al-Kanaani, Einas Al-Kuwari, Andrew Jeremijenko, Anvar Hassan Kaleeckal, Ali Nizar Latif, Riyazuddin Mohammad Shaik, Hanan F. Abdul-Rahim, Gheyath K. Nasrallah, Mohamed Ghaith Al-Kuwari, Adeel A. Butt, Hamad Eid Al-Romaihi, Mohamed H. Al-Thani, Abdullatif Al-Khal, Roberto Bertollini, Laith J. Abu-Raddad |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chile | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 49 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 48 | 94% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
Scientists | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 100% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,839,580
of 26,556,730 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#525
of 7,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,716
of 356,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#10
of 194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,556,730 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,885 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.