↓ Skip to main content

Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio predict outcome of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in emergency

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, August 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio predict outcome of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in emergency
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, August 2024
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2024.1366715
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xinyi Chen, Xinqun Li, Guangju Zhao, Wen Xu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2024.
All research outputs
#17,448,403
of 26,589,560 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#3,694
of 7,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,328
of 228,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#42
of 200 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,589,560 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,691 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 200 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.