↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: Cutaneous lupus erythematosus landscape: pathophysiology, unmet needs, and related challenges in clinical practice. What is on the horizon?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: Cutaneous lupus erythematosus landscape: pathophysiology, unmet needs, and related challenges in clinical practice. What is on the horizon?
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, February 2024
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2024.1373552
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph F. Merola, Filippa Nyberg, Nathalie Franchimont, Catherine Barbey, Victoria P. Werth

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,982,320
of 25,490,562 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#2,094
of 7,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,062
of 208,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#18
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,490,562 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,228 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.