↓ Skip to main content

Macrophages and pulmonary fibrosis: a bibliometric and visual analysis of publications from 1990 to 2023

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, June 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Macrophages and pulmonary fibrosis: a bibliometric and visual analysis of publications from 1990 to 2023
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, June 2024
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2024.1374177
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yi Min, Lifei Wu, Cheng Xu, Wen Han, Zhi Yin, Xu Pan, Luyao Sun, Jinrong Zhang, Guoqiang Wan, Tongxin Zhou

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2024.
All research outputs
#2,080,377
of 26,296,035 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#609
of 7,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,723
of 220,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#4
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,296,035 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.