The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bioinformatics and system biology approach to identify potential common pathogenesis for COVID-19 infection and sarcopenia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, June 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2024.1378846 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jun Zhong, Hui Yuan, Jinghong Yang, Yimin Du, Zheng Li, Xu Liu, Haibo Yang, Zhaojun Wang, Zi Wang, Lujun Jiang, Zhiqiang Ren, Hongliang Li, Zhong Li, Yanshi Liu |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2024.
All research outputs
#23,613,400
of 26,287,478 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#6,626
of 7,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,173
of 193,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#53
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,287,478 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,465 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.