The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Late-onset renal variant Fabry disease with R112H mutation and mild increase in plasma globotriaosylsphingosine: a case report
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, June 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2024.1383309 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Keiko Tanaka, Hitoshi Sugiyama, Hiroshi Morinaga, Akifumi Onishi, Katsuyuki Tanabe, Haruhito A. Uchida, Hiroki Maruyama, Jun Wada |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2024.
All research outputs
#21,370,951
of 26,231,860 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#5,243
of 7,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,534
of 241,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#55
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,231,860 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.