The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Biologic drugs in hidradenitis suppurativa: what does the GP have to know? A narrative review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2024.1403455 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pedro Mendes-Bastos, Farida Benhadou, Marina Venturini, Alejandro Molina-Levya, Nicolas Thomas, Ivette Alarcon, Falk G. Bechara |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2024.
All research outputs
#15,760,563
of 26,386,754 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#2,916
of 7,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,730
of 191,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#30
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,386,754 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,520 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.