↓ Skip to main content

The causal relationship between rheumatoid arthritis and bronchiectasis: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, June 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The causal relationship between rheumatoid arthritis and bronchiectasis: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, June 2024
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2024.1403851
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuanyuan Li, Weina Wang, Dengfeng Zhou, Lili Li

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2024.
All research outputs
#2,807,350
of 26,432,239 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#844
of 7,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,901
of 297,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#14
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,432,239 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,565 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.