↓ Skip to main content

Diagnosing sarcopenia in clinical practice: international guidelines vs. population-specific cutoff criteria

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diagnosing sarcopenia in clinical practice: international guidelines vs. population-specific cutoff criteria
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, July 2024
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2024.1405438
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arben Boshnjaku, Ermira Krasniqi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2024.
All research outputs
#23,796,624
of 26,490,075 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#6,736
of 7,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,066
of 204,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#109
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,490,075 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,599 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.