↓ Skip to main content

Long-term prognosis in patients with thymoma combined with myasthenia gravis: a propensity score-matching analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, June 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long-term prognosis in patients with thymoma combined with myasthenia gravis: a propensity score-matching analysis
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, June 2024
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2024.1407830
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kai Zhao, Yiming Liu, Miao Jing, Wenhan Cai, Jiamei Jin, Zirui Zhu, Leilei Shen, Jiaxin Wen, Zhiqiang Xue

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2024.
All research outputs
#5,072,257
of 26,298,949 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#1,447
of 7,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,155
of 240,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#11
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,298,949 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,473 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.