The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Clinical and structural damage outcomes in axial spondyloarthritis patients receiving NSAIDs or advanced therapies: a description of a real-life cohort
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, June 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2024.1425449 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anastasia Mocritcaia, Chafik Chacur, C. D. Adao Abe, Ana Belén Azuaga-Piñango, Beatriz Frade-Sosa, Juan C. Sarmiento-Monroy, Lucia Alascio, J. A. Gómez-Puerta, Raimon Sanmartí, Juan D. Cañete, Julio Ramírez |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Colombia | 1 | 20% |
Spain | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2024.
All research outputs
#8,011,039
of 26,178,431 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#2,089
of 7,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,030
of 151,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#13
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,178,431 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,427 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.