↓ Skip to main content

The diagnostic value of 68Ga-NOTA-MAL-Cys-MZHER2:342 PET/CT imaging for HER2-positive lung adenocarcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, August 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

reddit
1 Redditor
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The diagnostic value of 68Ga-NOTA-MAL-Cys-MZHER2:342 PET/CT imaging for HER2-positive lung adenocarcinoma
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, August 2024
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2024.1447500
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shu Li, Ke Wang, Xue Zhu, Donghui Pan, Ling Wang, Xu Guo, Xiaomin Gao, Qing Luo, Xun Wang

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2024.
All research outputs
#23,855,617
of 26,554,122 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#6,727
of 7,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,954
of 184,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#70
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,554,122 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,658 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,495 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.