You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Monitoring Adherence to Asthma Inhalers Using the InspirerMundi App: Analysis of Real-World, Medium-Term Feasibility Studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medical Technology, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmedt.2021.649506 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cristina Jácome, Rute Almeida, Ana Margarida Pereira, Rita Amaral, Pedro Vieira-Marques, Sandra Mendes, Magna Alves-Correia, José Alberto Ferreira, Inês Lopes, Joana Gomes, Luís Araújo, Mariana Couto, Cláudia Chaves Loureiro, Lilia Maia Santos, Ana Arrobas, Margarida Valério, Ana Todo Bom, João Azevedo, Maria Fernanda Teixeira, Manuel Ferreira-Magalhães, Paula Leiria Pinto, Nicole Pinto, Ana Castro Neves, Ana Morête, Filipa Todo Bom, Alberto Costa, Diana Silva, Maria João Vasconcelos, Helena Falcão, Maria Luís Marques, Ana Mendes, João Cardoso, José Carlos Cidrais Rodrigues, Georgeta Oliveira, Joana Carvalho, Carlos Lozoya, Natacha Santos, Fernando Menezes, Ricardo Gomes, Rita Câmara, Rodrigo Rodrigues Alves, Ana Sofia Moreira, Carmo Abreu, Rui Silva, Diana Bordalo, Carlos Alves, Cristina Lopes, Luís Taborda-Barata, Ricardo M. Fernandes, Rosário Ferreira, Carla Chaves-Loureiro, Maria José Cálix, Adelaide Alves, João Almeida Fonseca |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 4 | 15% |
| Researcher | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 12% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 11 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 4 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2021.
All research outputs
#18,143,395
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medical Technology
#112
of 230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#296,119
of 436,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medical Technology
#13
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.