You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
In vitro Characterization of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Intravenous Immunoglobulins (IVIg) Produced From Plasma of Donors Immunized With the BNT162b2 Vaccine and Its Comparison With a Similar Formulation Produced From Plasma of COVID-19 Convalescent Donors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medical Technology, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmedt.2021.772275 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gabriel Rojas-Jiménez, Daniela Solano, Álvaro Segura, Andrés Sánchez, Stephanie Chaves-Araya, María Herrera, Mariángela Vargas, Maykel Cerdas, Gerardo Calvo, Jonathan Alfaro, Sebastián Molina, Kimberly Bolaños, Andrés Moreira-Soto, Mauren Villalta, Adriana Sánchez, Daniel Cordero, Gina Durán, Gabriela Solano, Aarón Gómez, Andrés Hernández, Laura Sánchez, Marco Vargas, Jean Felix Drexler, Alberto Alape-Girón, Cecilia Díaz, Guillermo León |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Costa Rica | 2 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 15% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2024.
All research outputs
#4,774,173
of 26,139,724 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medical Technology
#30
of 299 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,621
of 529,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medical Technology
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,139,724 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 299 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 529,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.