The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Capsule endoscopy in Crohn's disease surveillance: A monocentric, retrospective analysis in Italy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medical Technology, November 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmedt.2022.1038087 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Carlo Calabrese, Dania Gelli, Fernando Rizzello, Paolo Gionchetti, Rafael Torrejon Torres, Rhodri Saunders, Jason Davis |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2022.
All research outputs
#18,722,646
of 23,206,358 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medical Technology
#137
of 227 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#301,105
of 439,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medical Technology
#17
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,206,358 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 227 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.