The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Computational Modeling of Deep Tissue Heating by an Automatic Thermal Massage Bed: Predicting the Effects on Circulation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medical Technology, June 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmedt.2022.925554 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jacek P. Dmochowski, Niranjan Khadka, Luis Cardoso, Edson Meneses, Kiwon Lee, Sungjin Kim, Youngsoo Jin, Marom Bikson |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 20% |
Professor | 1 | 10% |
Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 2 | 20% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 10% |
Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2022.
All research outputs
#14,979,439
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medical Technology
#96
of 215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,336
of 439,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medical Technology
#10
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.