The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Review of investigational medical devices' clinical trials and regulations in Africa as a benchmark for new innovations
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medical Technology, July 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmedt.2022.952767 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Brian Matovu, Mercy Takuwa, Charles Norman Mpaata, Fiona Denison, Noah Kiwanuka, Steff Lewis, John Norrie, Sam Ononge, Owen Muhimbise, Sharon Tuck, Maureen Dimitri Etuket, Robert T. Ssekitoleko |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Uganda | 6 | 67% |
Italy | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 17 | 63% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 7% |
Engineering | 2 | 7% |
Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
Mathematics | 1 | 4% |
Chemistry | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 19 | 70% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2022.
All research outputs
#4,012,236
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medical Technology
#23
of 214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,563
of 431,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medical Technology
#1
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 214 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.