The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Fluorescence molecular optomic signatures improve identification of tumors in head and neck specimens
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medical Technology, February 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmedt.2023.1009638 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yao Chen, Samuel S. Streeter, Brady Hunt, Hira S. Sardar, Jason R. Gunn, Laura J. Tafe, Joseph A. Paydarfar, Brian W. Pogue, Keith D. Paulsen, Kimberley S. Samkoe |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 27% |
Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
Lecturer | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 18% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 9% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 9% |
Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2023.
All research outputs
#14,595,123
of 23,372,207 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medical Technology
#84
of 231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,341
of 365,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medical Technology
#6
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,372,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 231 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.