The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Anti-Inflammatory Therapy for Feline Immunodeficiency Virus Infection and Associated AIDS-Like Syndrome
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2011
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00157 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Arne Lucas ten Hoeve, Arden Leander van Arnhem |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 1 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 14% |
Professor | 1 | 14% |
Student > Master | 1 | 14% |
Other | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 29% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2012.
All research outputs
#7,656,056
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#8,402
of 25,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,178
of 182,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#52
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.