↓ Skip to main content

Bottlenecks in the Transferability of Antibiotic Resistance from Natural Ecosystems to Human Bacterial Pathogens

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bottlenecks in the Transferability of Antibiotic Resistance from Natural Ecosystems to Human Bacterial Pathogens
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00265
Pubmed ID
Authors

José L Martínez

Abstract

It is generally accepted that resistance genes acquired by human pathogens through horizontal gene transfer originated in environmental, non-pathogenic bacteria. As a consequence, there is increasing concern on the roles that natural, non-clinical ecosystems, may play in the evolution of resistance. Recent studies have shown that the variability of determinants that can provide antibiotic resistance on their expression in a heterologous host is much larger than what is actually found in human pathogens, which implies the existence of bottlenecks modulating the transfer, spread, and stability of antibiotic resistance genes. In this review, the role that different factors such as founder effects, ecological connectivity, fitness costs, or second-order selection may have on the establishment of a specific resistance determinant in a population of bacterial pathogens is analyzed.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 206 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 39 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 18%
Student > Bachelor 30 14%
Student > Master 24 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 31 14%
Unknown 40 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 62 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 16 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 6%
Environmental Science 11 5%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 54 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2014.
All research outputs
#7,173,115
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#7,588
of 24,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,823
of 244,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#85
of 318 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 318 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.