The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Classical Labeling of Bacterial Pathogens According to Their Lifestyle in the Host: Inconsistencies and Alternatives
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00071 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Manuel T. Silva |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 182 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 23% |
| Researcher | 23 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 10% |
| Unknown | 44 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 39 | 21% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 22 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 22 | 12% |
| Unknown | 47 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2020.
All research outputs
#4,221,406
of 23,007,887 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#4,319
of 25,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,827
of 245,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#43
of 320 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,887 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 320 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.