↓ Skip to main content

The Second Skin: Ecological Role of Epibiotic Biofilms on Marine Organisms

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
356 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
510 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Second Skin: Ecological Role of Epibiotic Biofilms on Marine Organisms
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00292
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Wahl, Franz Goecke, Antje Labes, Sergey Dobretsov, Florian Weinberger

Abstract

In the aquatic environment, biofilms on solid surfaces are omnipresent. The outer body surface of marine organisms often represents a highly active interface between host and biofilm. Since biofilms on living surfaces have the capacity to affect the fluxes of information, energy, and matter across the host's body surface, they have an important ecological potential to modulate the abiotic and biotic interactions of the host. Here we review existing evidence how marine epibiotic biofilms affect their hosts' ecology by altering the properties of and processes across its outer surfaces. Biofilms have a huge potential to reduce its host's access to light, gases, and/or nutrients and modulate the host's interaction with further foulers, consumers, or pathogens. These effects of epibiotic biofilms may intensely interact with environmental conditions. The quality of a biofilm's impact on the host may vary from detrimental to beneficial according to the identity of the epibiotic partners, the type of interaction considered, and prevailing environmental conditions. The review concludes with some unresolved but important questions and future perspectives.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 510 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 490 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 126 25%
Researcher 88 17%
Student > Master 83 16%
Student > Bachelor 46 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 5%
Other 64 13%
Unknown 79 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 224 44%
Environmental Science 65 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 50 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 23 5%
Chemistry 9 2%
Other 34 7%
Unknown 105 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2021.
All research outputs
#2,317,590
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#1,845
of 24,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,578
of 244,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#20
of 317 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 317 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.