↓ Skip to main content

The Binning of Metagenomic Contigs for Microbial Physiology of Mixed Cultures

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
200 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
384 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Binning of Metagenomic Contigs for Microbial Physiology of Mixed Cultures
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00410
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marc Strous, Beate Kraft, Regina Bisdorf, Halina E. Tegetmeyer

Abstract

So far, microbial physiology has dedicated itself mainly to pure cultures. In nature, cross feeding and competition are important aspects of microbial physiology and these can only be addressed by studying complete communities such as enrichment cultures. Metagenomic sequencing is a powerful tool to characterize such mixed cultures. In the analysis of metagenomic data, well established algorithms exist for the assembly of short reads into contigs and for the annotation of predicted genes. However, the binning of the assembled contigs or unassembled reads is still a major bottleneck and required to understand how the overall metabolism is partitioned over different community members. Binning consists of the clustering of contigs or reads that apparently originate from the same source population. In the present study eight metagenomic samples from the same habitat, a laboratory enrichment culture, were sequenced. Each sample contained 13-23 Mb of assembled contigs and up to eight abundant populations. Binning was attempted with existing methods but they were found to produce poor results, were slow, dependent on non-standard platforms or produced errors. A new binning procedure was developed based on multivariate statistics of tetranucleotide frequencies combined with the use of interpolated Markov models. Its performance was evaluated by comparison of the results between samples with BLAST and in comparison to existing algorithms for four publicly available metagenomes and one previously published artificial metagenome. The accuracy of the new approach was comparable or higher than existing methods. Further, it was up to a 100 times faster. It was implemented in Java Swing as a complete open source graphical binning application available for download and further development (http://sourceforge.net/projects/metawatt).

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 384 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 3%
Brazil 3 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 353 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 91 24%
Researcher 87 23%
Student > Master 50 13%
Student > Bachelor 41 11%
Student > Postgraduate 15 4%
Other 46 12%
Unknown 54 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 163 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 67 17%
Environmental Science 28 7%
Computer Science 17 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 16 4%
Other 27 7%
Unknown 66 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2017.
All research outputs
#7,622,671
of 23,932,490 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#8,065
of 26,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,924
of 250,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#89
of 319 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,932,490 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,856 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 319 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.