↓ Skip to main content

Causes, consequences, and perspectives in the variations of intestinal density of colonization of multidrug-resistant enterobacteria

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Causes, consequences, and perspectives in the variations of intestinal density of colonization of multidrug-resistant enterobacteria
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00129
Pubmed ID
Authors

Etienne Ruppé, Antoine Andremont

Abstract

The intestinal microbiota is a complex environment that hosts 10(13) to 10(14) bacteria. Among these bacteria stand multidrug-resistant enterobacteria (MDRE), which intestinal densities can substantially vary, especially according to antibiotic exposure. The intestinal density of MDRE and their relative abundance (i.e., the proportion between the density of MDRE and the density of total enterobacteria) could play a major role in the infection process or patient-to-patient transmission. This review discusses the recent advances in understanding (i) what causes variations in the density or relative abundance of intestinal colonization, (ii) what are the clinical consequences of these variations, and (iii) what are the perspectives for maintaining these markers at low levels.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
France 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 95 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 18%
Researcher 17 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 20 20%
Unknown 19 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 23 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2014.
All research outputs
#7,129,390
of 26,381,372 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#6,546
of 30,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,258
of 294,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#87
of 405 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,381,372 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,200 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 405 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.